Perfect: To get Palin’s lawsuit tossed, NYT must prove NYT editorial writers don’t read the NYT

**Written by Doug Powers
This could be the “pass the popcorn” moment for the ages:
In an unusual move, New York federal court judge Jed Rakoff has called for an evidentiary hearing in Sarah Palin’s defamation lawsuit against The New York Times. The lawsuit is just six weeks old, but the judge says he needs to hear from the paper’s editorial writer(s) to decide whether the lawsuit should move forward.
[…] The editorial originally linked one of Palin’s political action committee ads to a 2011 mass shooting that severely wounded then-Arizona Congressman Gabby Giffords. After the editorial ran, the paper issued a correction acknowledging that no link had been established.
Palin claims the newspaper published something it “knew to be false,” which would constitute actual malice, a necessary element in defamation actions brought by public figures.
In a motion to dismiss, the Times is challenging whether Palin’s complaint contains sufficient allegations of actual malice.
Rakoff writes in

Continue Reading....

Check Also

Confirmed: Iran president really misses previous administration

Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Digg Del StumbleUpon E-mail Reddit Buffer Love This**Written by Doug …

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend